Carbon Is Natural And Necessary

Carbon is both natural and necessary for our survival.  We are carbon based life forms.  Plants breathe carbon dioxide and depend on it for their survival.  There is a carbon cycle necessary for life on our planet to continue.

The new cap and trade carbon tax scheme recently passed by the U.S. House of Representatives is an insidious tax plan, and a huge government power grab.  The statists, primarily Democrats with a handful of Republicans, want to insert more government control over your lives.

Do you use electricity in your home?  You will pay more for it.  Do you use gasoline or diesel in your vehicles or farm equipment?  You will pay more for it.  Do you buy food and other products at a retail store?  You will pay more for the lights to be on at the store, and more for the freight to get products there.

Has your home been inspected and rated by government environmental regulators?  Under the new cap and trade plan, you will not be able to sell your home unless your drafty windows and doors have received a seal of approval from a political appointee.

I believe in the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  After securing the fundamental right to exist, the next thing I want is for government to simply leave me alone.  I don’t want your inspectors telling me what I need to do in order to sell my home.  Let me work out a deal with a prospective buyer.  If there are any deficiencies, I am sure the buyer will ask for a discounted price.  That is how negotiations are done, deals are made, and contracts written.  Between the buyer and the seller.  It does not require a political appointee to insert himself in the middle.

The proposed cap and trade system of government carbon credits will benefit the politcally well connected.  Wall Street will make money on transaction fees from the “trading”.  Companies that are given credits (in a political process, not a market process) will do well.  Those that can buy enough credits to continue doing business may survive.  The rest will cease to exist.  Despite this, the politicians that passed this are saying it will actually create jobs!

The author, Thomas Woods, recently said that cap and trade will create jobs in the same sense that burning down every other house in the neighborhood will: claiming that the reconstruction will spur growth in the economy while ignoring the cost.

Hopefully the Senate will kill this bad bill.  Cap and trade has not produced the promised results when it was implemented in Spain, and it won’t here either.

Watch the new Heritage Foundation video about Cap and Trade:

Charge Of The RINO’s On Cap and Trade

Washington’s 8th Congressional District Representative Dave Reichert was one of eight Republicans to vote for the Cap and Trade Bill yesterday.

The total cost of the bill is unknown.  Not a singe member of Congress read the bill before voting on it, yet it was pushed through for a vote without waiting for any public input.

Republicans attempted to introduce amendments that would have softened the mandates of the bill, when certain triggers occurred.  One proposal would have negated the effects of the bill when gasoline goes over $5 per gallon.  Another would have sidelined costly mandates when unemployment goes over 20%.

The proponents of this bill did not allow any amendments to make it better.  They did not allow the public to become aware of what was in it, or to make any feedback to their representatives about it.

A handful of turncoat Republicans helped to pass this bad bill.  However, 44 Democrats broke ranks with their party and opposed it.

This is a bad bill that will hurt our economy if it becomes law.  It is now going to the Senate for consideration.

I will update this blog with more information about why these regulations are so harmful in the next few days.

Thank you to all the Republicans and Democrats that voted against this economy wrecking legislation.  Shame on those who voted for it!

State Rep. David Taylor Holds Town Hall Meeting In Sunnyside

Last night (Thursday) State Representative David Taylor held a town hall meeting in Sunnyside.  Taylor has been holding a series of meetings throughout the 15th District to hear what is on the minds of voters.  He is seeking input from citizens on what short term and long term issues they would like the legislature to be focusing on.

Some issues that Taylor said that keep coming up are: education, water, and economic development.

On the education issue, Taylor noted that the dropout rate in Sunnyside schools seemed high, and postulated that promoting a three track curriculum may be one way to address the issue.  He noted that over the last 20 years, schools have moved away from vocational and technical training options, and increasingly put students on a one-track program.  Taylor said that he comes from a family of educators, and has also met with the Sunnyside Schools Superintendent to discuss the high dropout rate.

Taylor said one way to deal with the high dropout rate would be to offer a three track program for students.  All three tracks would promote the traditional basics like reading, writing, and arithmetic; but would have divergent attributes from there.

  • Track A would be primarily a vocational or technical track.  Students in this track would graduate high school and be able to get good jobs as skilled laborers.  Welding, auto repair, nursing, and robotics could be taught under this track.
  • Track B would be for those students that are not sure if they want to go to college or not.  It would be set up for those more likely to earn a two-year degree after high school.  It would not include the most advanced college placement classes, but would offer some challenging college prep work to engage students.
  • Track C would be designed for those that are almost 100% sure they will be pursuing a four-year degree after high school.  It would include the most advanced course offerings.

Taylor said the state could run a “pilot” program, perhaps in Sunnyside, to try and address the issue of a high dropout rate.  By offering more options than a one track system, students would hopefully remain engaged, and be more productive members of society by working as skilled laborers after leaving school.

Rep. Taylor reiterated support for the state constitutional requirements to address public health, safety, and education.  He disagreed with priorities being shifted away from these areas, with more money being spent on environmental programs.  He noted that the state spent several million dollars to buy an island for those who like to kayak to paddle around, while cuts were made in education, parks, and many other areas.

The state budget continues to suffer from deficit projections, despite revenues being fairly stable.  Taylor said that the budget problems are more of a spending problem than a revenue problem.  He is opposed to raising taxes to pay for more state programs.

I would personally like to thank State Representative David Taylor for making himself available to the citizens in this public meeting.  He said that he intends to hold more such meetings in the future, at least a couple of times a year, in various parts of the 15th District.

My Socialized Medicine Experience (Part 3)

This is the third, and final, post in a series about my experience with government and healthcare.

In the first post of this series I touched on a few of the reasons why health insurance is employer based, and not centered on you, as an individual.  The main reason for this is government interference in the marketplace.

My last post was about my experience with U.S. Government run healthcare, while I was in the U.S. military.  (This is definitely not the direction we want to move in for the healthcare of all Americans.)

Those who know me, and have been reading this blog, will know that I generally favor free market solutions.  The problems with healthcare and health insurance in the United States are not based on a free market system, but stem from an intrusive and overbearing government.  More government involvement will simply not provide better quality care, or realize any substantial cost savings.  It will provide more regulation, control, loss of quality, and stifle any private venture that tries to compete.

Current cost estimates for Obama’s healthcare proposal run $1.5 trillion.  (Please don’t tell Obama what number comes after a trillion!)  This proposal will put much control over our healthcare industry into the hands of an unelected board of officials.  This board will decide who gets care, and who does not.

  • Government bureaucrats will have access to all of your medical records through a nationwide Medical Record Database.  They will be able to access your personal records without your consent.
  • Private health insurance will exist in name only, as the government will run its own “company” to “compete”.
  • Taxes will be substantially increased to pay for the cost of this unconstitutional program.
  • Government officials will intrude in our personal lives, telling us what we can eat, drink, or smoke, through “health” regulations passed.

You may even be forced to undergo treatment against your will.  While in the service, I was forced to take Anthrax vaccinations under threat of court-martial.  These vaccines were not FDA approved, and the FDA eventually shut down the plant that manufactured them for unsanitary practices.  (Coincidentally, a retired Admiral who had endorsed then-President Clinton during his campaign, was on the board of directors for the company that made the vaccine.)  Political corruption, and political reasoning will be the basis for healthcare decisions.  It will not be based on supply and demand.

We can and must do better than this.  Our government is broke.  Social Security and Medicare “trust” funds have already been spent.  The government does not have the money to do what it is proposing.  We need to go in the opposite direction: stop government spending in the healthcare system, loosen restrictions on forming new health insurance companies, allow competition across state lines, end the tax incentive for employers to provide health insurance by giving it to individuals instead.  These changes will allow individuals to keep the policy they have when they change jobs.

My Socialized Medicine Experience (Part 2)

This is the second part of a continuing series of posts about my experience with government and healthcare.

My last post sketched out some of the problems with individuals being able to procure health insurance in the U.S., primarily because of government interference in the marketplace.  The government has enacted many laws and regulations over the years that force individuals into “groups” for coverage.  This has destroyed the traditional doctor-patient relationship.

Everyone agrees there are problems with the current system, but incredibly, some are calling for even more government involvement as a solution.  How would the United States Government run healthcare?  Look to the V.A. Hospitals, and ask yourself if that is what you want for all Americans.  Look at the quality of care in the military system of healthcare, and ask yourself if that is what you want for your family.  If we go completely socialist on healthcare, it will be all of that, and worse.

I spent four years on active duty in the U.S. Army.  I personally witnessed rationing of healthcare by government officials, with V.I.P.’s and the politically connected receiving special treatment.  I saw long lines for the dispensing of medications, with patients sometimes waiting hours for something they could take for their persistent cough.

I saw marriages destroyed by unexpected pregnancies, when botched vasectomies were performed at the military hospital.  I saw doctors get transferred to other installations, rather than being fired, because of a corrupt, and ineffective system of government, that does not hold individuals accountable.

I saw a friend of mine almost die due to horrendous malpractice committed by so-called “care” administered by a U.S. Government run hospital.  My friend went down on the ground in convulsions, while we were in the field on a training exercise.  When we got back to the rear a couple of weeks later, we were shocked to find our buddy had been “lost” at the hospital.  The incompetent staff lost his chart, and no one had been checking on him for days as he lay unconscious in a bed at the hospital.

When he finally regained consciousness, they began a course of treatment.  This lack of care was enormously bad, even by the standards of the badly run government hospital.  Despite that, no one received any adverse disciplinary action, and my buddy ended up having to sue the government to get them to pay for his healthcare needs after they kicked him out of the service on a medical discharge.

As an officer, I attended meetings where resource allocations were made for healthcare on our installation.  The number of clinics needed for the population (both military and civilian were discussed).  Doctors and nurses were rationed to the clinics.  Some units were considered high priority, and others less so.  Some received more resources accordingly.  Thus, some of the blessed would have shorter wait times for care than others.  This is the kind of political policy making decisions we can expect if we institute government run healthcare on the American people.

I don’t know about you, but I do not trust my Congressman and Senators with that kind of decision making for me and my family.  Even our Congressional representatives may be powerless to intervene if the majority of Congress devotes more resources to say, the East Coast States, than those of us that live out West.  Are you prepared to have some guy in a cube, in Washington D.C., determine if we can have a hospital in Sunnyside?  Or if we will have doctors on staff there?  The power brokers will make these kinds of decisions, and despite protests from the community that we need them here, there will be no local decision-making involved.

Do you really want a fully socialist, centrally run, healthcare system?

I vote for a market based system, where doctors and patients make the decisions.  I also vote for a system of INDIVIDUAL insurance in the healthcare market.

To be continued…

My Socialized Medicine Experience (Part 1)

This is the first post in what will be a multi-part blog series.  Additional posts on this topic will be coming soon:

There is great discussion taking place right now about whether or not to socialize medicine in the United States, even more than it has been already.  To be sure, there are problems with the medical insurance system we have now.  Most of these issues could be resolved by getting the government to stop interfering with the marketplace.

Think about it: health insurance is the only insurance you get through your employer-based group.  When you need car insurance, it does not matter if you are self-employed, or work for a large corporation; you are in a private market, and can seek insurance through any company of your choosing.  Ditto for life insurance, property insurance, rental insurance, travel insurance, and a whole host of other insurance products.

Back in the 1940s and 1950s the government put caps on the wages that companies could pay employees.  These wage controls caused employers to start offering more “benefits” in lieu of wages.  The employer-based health insurance system was in its infancy at this point.  Later, Medicare was instituted, an outright government takeover of a market sector for health insurance.  Government Medicaid programs also interfere with the insurance market by covering millions more.

For nearly four years, I worked at a Fortune 500 company that provides health insurance.  The company I worked for derived 95%+ of its profits by providing benefits to other Fortune 500 companies.  The portion of people employed by Fortune 500 companies is dropping, the last time I checked it was 19%.  The company continued to struggle making money as its total membership kept dropping.  Medical inflation, far outpacing the general rate of inflation, was further influenced by Medicare/Medicaid government programs blindly pumping money into the medical sector of our economy.

Due to both Federal and State regulations on insurance, it was impractical for the company I worked for to offer individual health insurance.  At my office, we received inquiries from individuals and small businesses on an almost daily basis from people trying to buy insurance.  The company would not even give a price quote to anyone with less than 50 employees.  Even then, the group was considered too small to bother with, and a quote would be provided with a price so astronomically high the company would “move along” and seek solutions elsewhere.

Now, a new government run health insurance scheme is being devised to “compete” with private health insurance.  The theory is that the government can provide service cheaper, forcing the private health insurance companies to “innovate”.  What a bunch of crap!

Will they provide efficient service like the post office does?  (They outlaw private carriers from delivering mail.)  Will they provide efficient service like AmTrak?  (They are not self-sufficient despite the original temporary government takeover of passenger rail service.)

No, if we really want competition and innovation, we can do without the increased government interference in the marketplace.  We could go in the other direction, simplifying the various government department of insurance regulations that make companies like the one I used to work for not want to quote individual policies for health insurance.  We could phase out medicare/medicaid programs, and let patients work out payment arrangements directly with doctors.

The doctors would save countless man-hours on administrative costs, without having to comply with government red tape for Medicare/Medicaid and the large employer based insurance programs that exist now.

We need a true private market in order to offer solutions to individuals, and not just groups.

To be continued….

Sunnyside Psychology

A little lay psychological analysis from your blog editor:

I remarked to an acquaintance:

You know, there are some people in this world that would get mad at you, even if you hung them with a new rope!

He replied: “It’s amazing our Sunnyside City Council doesn’t get that.”

I told him: “It’s amazing you made that connection with the City Council.”

Yakima County Republicans Endorse David Taylor For 15th District Representative

David Taylor, State Representative, 15th District

David Taylor, State Representative, 15th District

The Yakima County Republican Central Committee endorsed David Taylor of Moxee for the Washington 15th Legislative District Representative position tonight at its meeting of Precinct Committee Officers.

Mr. Taylor said one purpose in speaking tonight was to remind everyone that the state representative seat is on the ballot for election this year.  He was appointed by the county commissioners of the four counties in the district earlier this year.  This is the first time he will be on the ballot.

Representative Taylor mentioned that there are only 61 days until the primary election.  Although three candidates will appear on the ballot, one Democrat challenger, John Gotts, has already seen the writing on the wall and withdrawn from the contest.  Gotts informed the media he was calling it quits after the allotted time for a candidate to officially withdraw, therefore his name will still be on the ballot.

Mr. Taylor said he has amassed about $8,000 so far, which puts him slightly ahead of his fund-raising goal this far into the campaign.  According to Mr. Taylor, his other Democrat challenger, Donicio Marichalar of Grandview, has not filed any information with the Public Disclosure Commission of Washington in regards to his campaign funds.  Taylor said this information was due about a week ago.

Mr. Taylor will be holding a town hall meeting in Sunnyside at 7 PM, Thursday, June 25, 2009 at Banner Bank.  The meeting is to allow him to hear from citizens about issues in the district.  Last year, 15th District Senator Jim Honeyford, was able to get three bills passed after hearing input from the citizens about what is important to them.

Representative Taylor said it is also important for him to hear what is on the minds of people in the community so he can work to address those issues in Olympia.  The town hall meeting is open to the public, and all are invited to attend.

Poll: Most View Internet As Most Reliable News Source

A new Zogby poll indicates that most Americans consider the Internet to be the most reliable news source.

  • 40% of adults rank the Internet as the most reliable news source
  • 17% said TV
  • 16% said newspapers
  • 13% said radio

Many of the poll respondents still consider newspapers a reliable source of information, but are receiving their news from on-line newspaper websites.  My guess is that this trend will continue.

Delivering newspapers is manpower intensive, leaves a large carbon footprint, and is slow, compared to posting information on-line.  The future will be more electronic delivery of news.  With smart phones, Kindles and other wireless readers, laptops, and more broadband access, it seems only natural to get news this way.

Only 0.5% of those polled said newspapers would be their main source of information in five years.

Newspapers are not dying, but newsprint is.

Reference:

Reuters article: Internet most popular information source: poll

BLOGSUNNYSIDE’S T-Ball Twittering Scandal

Earlier today (Tuesday) my wife came to me and was very upset because she could not find any information about T-Ball in Sunnyside on-line.  She said that the City has cut Parks and Recreation this year.  (Very true, and also sad.)

I explained to her (she is not a news junkie like I am), that the City had cut Parks and Recreation, as well as other “optional” services in order to fund pay raises and increased vacation hours for City employees.  Naturally, she was upset, and I made an update on my Twitter account mentioning the fact the budget was cut for certain programs in order to pay for the priorities the current City Council set.

As luck would have it, I was out of town today, and not able to follow up with much on-line.  However, and I may live to regret mentioning this, the e-mail for this blog gets forwarded to my cell phone.  After making my Twitter update, I received an e-mail from Council Member Carol Stone informing me that the Cal Ripken league has picked up T-ball this year, and that the program continues under their league, but not the City.  Ms. Stone also mentioned that other activities are available, such as Art in the Park held on Tuesdays; and that swimming lessons are available at the pool as well.

She gave me the contact phone number for Lisa Fairbairn, with Sunnyside’s Promise, (509.836.8417) for more information.  At one point I did attempt to contact her today, but got her voice mail.  I was busy and did not not get another chance to call back.  In fairness to Ms. Fairbairn, I did not leave a message, thinking I could call later.  However, my schedule did not allow for that after all.

Ms. Fairbairn also sent me some information by e-mail.  She sent me some attachments as well, which my phone can not view, but I have reviewed them after getting back home.  She says that the T-ball is in its third week of the season, and that Cal Ripken baseball picked it up in order to spare the kids from the Sunnyside Council’s budget cuts.  She said that it is a good fit for the baseball league, and that they have 70 youth in the T-ball, and another 130 in the baseball leagues.  Ms. Fairbairn also said that they are working with the City to get their league information posted on the City’s website.  Registration for the baseball leagues starts in February each year and includes children ages 5-13.

This answers the question my wife was originally searching to answer.  Our son is four, and we did not know if he could be involved in T-ball or not.  (Or if it still was available in Sunnyside.)

I received some additional replies on my Twitter account informing me that an announcement was published in the SCS Newsletter, (I am assuming that is Sunnyside Christian School), and also from John Fannin, of the Daily Sun News, who mentioned that he was taking pictures of T-ball for the DSN.  Mr. Fannin also mentioned that T-ball takes place at South Hill Park on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

What started out as a simple Twitter update turned into quite an educational experience, with several responses by various mediums.  Thanks to everyone that shared their information with me.  Hopefully, we can get a link to the Cal Ripken league on the City’s website, or at least some more detailed information listed there.

My thanks also go out to the Cal Ripken league for picking up the slack, and taking over this activity.

And so ends the great T-Ball Twittering Scandal of Tuesday.  I can’t wait to see what happens tomorrow!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,687 other followers