Washington Voters Likely To Get Liquored Up Ballot Issue

Vintage Washington State Liquor Control Board tax stamp, ca. 1936

COSTCO has gotten behind a voter initiative that would privatize liquor sales in the state of Washington.  They had tables set out at stores, and after only 16 days, say that they have enough signatures to get it certified for the ballot this fall.  If passed, it would eliminate state-run and state-contracted liquor stores.  It would also eliminate the state-owned warehouse and distribution of liquor, allowing private businesses to exercise some free-market principles in meeting consumer demand.  The industry would, however, still be heavily regulated, with licensing and permits being required to ensure that only responsible businesses are engaged in this trade.

According to page four of the Informed Voter Guide, published by the Evergreen Freedom Foundation, state taxpayers subsidize the state with hundreds of millions of dollars for its warehousing and distribution of liquor.  Operating costs alone run $120 million each year, with liquor taxes collected on top of that.

This is not a line of business that we need government involved in.  It is a prohibition-era monopoly that has outlived its usefulness.

A resolution supporting the elimination of state and contract retail liquor stores, and allowing the sale of distilled spirits to be sold in grocery stores and other retail outlets as wine and beer is now sold; while also eliminating the state’s monopoly on the wholesale of distilled spirits and allowing private companies to wholesale liquor was approved by the Platform Committee of the Washington State Republican Party, and recommended as “Do Pass” to delegates at the Party’s recent convention.

Republicans are not the only ones that support the idea of privatizing liquor sales.  Back in January, State Representative Kelli Linville, (D-Bellingham) Chairwoman of the House Ways and Means Committee, was asking her colleagues in the legislature to consider privatizing not only liquor sales, but also technology services and other functions within the state government.  Unfortunately, the issue of liquor privatization did not make much headway in the legislature, as the entrenched interests in the current regime prevented its passage.

Thanks to the hard work of people at COSTCO and others, it looks likely that the issue will be certified for the ballot, so voters can make their wishes directly known, without the influence of lobbyists protecting special interests.

Additional Information:

The Seattle Times: Costco exec thinks liquor-store privatization measure will qualify for ballot

The Seattle Times: Wash. lawmakers, governor talk gov’t reforms

Evergreen Freedom Foundation: Informed Voter Guide

Text of Initiative 1100 concerns liquor (beer, wine and spirits)

About these ads

Sunnyside Spent $79,168 On Legal Bills Since July

The City of Sunnyside spent $79,168.46 on legal bills since July 8th, 2009.  These bills have come from the legal firm of Menke Jackson, which has been contracted to provide interim legal services for the City.

Previously, Sunnyside had a full time City Attorney, making approximately $100,000 per year.  However, the City Attorney quit in protest over the City Council’s firing of the last City Manager.

In August, the City Council increased the budget for attorney fees by $100,000 per year.  However, when considering that the City is spending about $20,000 per month for legal services, this does not appear to be enough.

At the current rate at which City Council is using legal services, the annual bill will be $240,000!

This makes a $100,000 a year City Attorney look like quite a bargain indeed.

Reference:

City of Sunnyside Claims Vouchers

7/8/09 Menke Jackson Law Firm paid $31,004.48

9/8/09 Menke Jackson Law Firm paid $48,163.98

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,976 other followers