America’s Youth Increasingly Ask This Question…

Who Is Ben Ghazi?

Who Is Ben Ghazi? #benghazi #reportbenghazi

Who Is Ben Ghazi? #benghazi #reportbenghazi (Photo credit: charlesfettinger)

Carrie Ann Inaba, a judge on “Dancing With The Stars”, reportedly asked, “My dress was so hot, it made me wish I’d lined up a date! Who is Ben Ghazi, and is he seeing anyone?”

Madonna recently posed the question, “Who is Ben Ghazi, and why are the Republicans so obsessed with him? Why have I not heard of him before? He sounds like the kind of person I should know.”

A letter submitted to “Seventeen” magazine took the editors to task for failing to report on one of the “hottest guys on the planet.” The writer said she had overheard her parents talking about him like he is a bad guy, and asked the magazine to publish his contact info in hopes of getting a date with him.  She also wanted to know if Ben Ghazi likes girls who wear heels to school.

On Twitter, a young man asked “Sports Illustrated” if Ben Ghazi is the NBA player who announced he is gay.

A reader commented on “Lowrider” magazine’s website asking where the “Ben Ghazi” chat thread moved. He is sure it was there when he looked at the website before. He asked if the San Diego Police Department is involved in getting the discussion taken down; adding that they don’t like his 2007 Crown Victoria lowrider he uses for cruising.

The reality, which will crush those interested in getting to know him, is that Ben Ghazi is not a guy. It is a place where something happened. To find out what happened, you will need to change the channel, and watch something besides MSNBC and Comedy Central for news.

About these ads

School Board Moves To Remove “Citizens” From Belief Statement

The Sunnyside School Board took steps towards eliminating the use of the word “citizens” in its belief statement at Thursday night’s meeting.

Board member Michelle Perry noted that often “citizens” can be seen as an intimidating word to some people who may not be here legally.  She said, “We should look for a more friendly word.  I think it needs to be “people” or “members” to be more cohesive and inclusive.”

In addition, school board members decided to change the word “parents” to “parents/families” since there are families in the community where children are not living with their parents.

The school board unanimously approved a first reading of the changes, and will consider finalizing them on a second reading at their April meeting.

If adopted the changes will effect the third part of the school district’s Belief Statement:

We believe it is the responsibility of parents/families, staff and the

citizens members of our community to ensure the development of

our youth.

<div style=”margin-bottom:5px”> <strong> <a href=”http://www.slideshare.net/rainesman6/belief-statements” title=”Belief statements” target=”_blank”>Belief statements</a> </strong> from <strong><a href=”http://www.slideshare.net/rainesman6″ target=”_blank”>Jason Raines</a></strong> </div>

Excuse Me While I Save The World!

Review of Righteous Indignation

by Andrew Breitbart

righteous indignation

A free speech advocate, Andrew Breitbart believed in encouraging more engagement in the civil discourse.  To say it another way, he wanted to promote ideas and discussion where the left-wing “Democrat Media Complex” seeks to stifle discussion to promote their liberal beliefs.

Breitbart passed away in March 2012 at the age of 43, but made a serious impact in his short time on the national scene.  The book details his involvement with the Drudge Report, Huffington Post, other media outlets, and goes great lengths in explaining how and why the “BIG” sights launched.  (Big Government, Big Hollywood, Big Journalism, Big Peace)

The first impactful story that Big Government helped bring to the people led to the downfall of ACORN, a community organizing group tied closely to the election of Barack Obama.  You may recall the infamous videos of the “pimp and prostitute” seeking government grants to support their start up business of prostituting underage girls illegally brought into the country from Latin America.  Workers at ACORN offered tips and advice on how to get taxpayer funding, suggesting using code words to obscure the link to prostitution.

In his book, Breitbart discusses taking the story first to the mainstream media, who did not run the story because it was “too political.”  This played right into his hands as it exposed media’s leftist agenda of protecting liberals no matter the cost.  When the story went big, they were eventually forced to report on it.

Part blogger, part publisher, part activist, part provocateur, Breitbart is greatly missed for his entertaining antics and great courage under fire.  He never shrank when the lefties attempted to silence him by calling him “racist” and other such epithets.  His unwavering spirit in the face of repressive political correctness is an inspiration for all Americans.

The book gets 5 stars out of 5.  It is the best book on politics, pop culture, new media, and current events that I have read in recent years.

Book Review: All Over but the Shoutin’

All Over but the Shoutin’

by Rick Bragg

alloverbuththeshoutin

 The author is self-described as “liberal-minded.”  He does not speak often of conservatives and/or Republicans, and when he does, it is usually with disdain.  He is originally from Alabama, a state I was a resident of for four years while in college.

Rick Bragg grew up with a single mom – his alcoholic father abandoned the family when he was little.  His earliest memory is sitting on a sack, being pulled along rows of cotton, as his mother picked, and filled the sack to provide for her kids.  This book is his autobiography.

Growing up on welfare lunches is not the foundation one expects for a Pulitzer Prize winning author and journalist, but this is Bragg’s story.  He spends a great deal of the book telling stories of his family; and the traditions of a humble people of the American South.  It made me laugh out loud on multiple occasions, and also melancholy for its dreariness.

Through a combination of skill, luck, and timing, Bragg made his career without the benefit of a formal college education.  Despite his lack of pedigree (or more likely because of it), he worked to be good in his chosen profession.  After starting off in a small town Alabama newspaper, he ended up following an unlikely road to being a reporter for The New York Times.

While at The Grey Lady, he won the Pulitzer Prize for feature writing.  While he discusses the prize near the end of the book, it is merely a plot device for him to tell stories of his family.

The book is recommended for its storytelling, unique descriptive tones, and country flair rendered by Bragg.  I rate it 3 stars out of 5.

When Your Boss Asks Too Much Of You

Umm, Yeah. I’m gonna need you to come in on Saturday.

Umm, Yeah. I'm gonna need you to come in on Saturday.

Image via funnyjunk.com

We have all heard stories about the evil boss, who expects too much of the employees.  While most people can tell stories of working weekends, mandatory overtime, or giving up planned time off, these are simply everyday inconveniences.  What do you do when your boss asks too much of you?

Some readers may not like open ended questions that I do not have the answers for.  If you are turned off by speculative questions about the nature of life, stop here.  If your curiosity is up, then read on…

What if your boss asks you to do something against company policy?  This might be tough if the boss is the one who makes the policy.  What if your boss asks you to do something unethical?  This can be tougher, because different people have different values that drive them, although I never will suggest anyone violate their personal principles.

What if your boss asks you to do something you know is illegal?  What if you are asked to hire someone that is not legally authorized to work in the United States?  The fact that millions of people are employed with lack of proper documentation does not make it legal.  Are some laws more important than others?

Yes, some laws are more important than others.  For this reason, our justice system dispenses punishment differently, depending on the nature of the illegal activity.  Thousands of companies and millions of people willfully violate labor laws each day, and are willing to risk the legal consequences for the potential gain of profits and/or increased wages.

Are some labor laws more important than others?  What if your boss asks you to adjust the “hours worked” on an employee’s payroll in order to reduce or eliminate overtime?  Would you risk your own livelihood by opposing this?  Sadly, many people in this position do not have the moral courage or conviction to do so.  Class action lawsuits both nationally, and in our local area, testify to the fact that too many workers get cheated on their paychecks by unethical and illegal business practices.

What if your boss manipulates payroll accounts to reduce the company’s tax liability?  What if they simply pay employees “under the table?”  Does that make it okay?

What if programs such as Social Security and Medicare are threatened because too many people are dodging the payroll taxes that support them?  Is it still okay?

A Line Almost No One Will Cross

What if your boss asks you to murder someone?  What if they are willing to pay a hefty fee for the “job?”

That is what allegedly happened in Union Gap recently.  It is being reported that a manager of a business in our county offered to pay money to a coworker in order to kill his wife.  The coworker refused to be the trigger man, but according to news reports, was willing to help dispose of the murder weapon.

Killing another person is a clear moral boundary for most people, and we thankfully don’t need to worry about this being repeated millions of times across the country.  The murder suspect also is being accused of having an affair, and this may be a part of his decision to murder his wife.

Don’t get me started on how many people cheat on their spouses; let’s just say I’m against the idea, and leave it at that.  The fact that this happens frequently in our society says something about where we draw our collective values from (or don’t).

Values Being Taught To Kids

One set of “rules” that is trendy in many of our nation’s schools is boiled down to three simple things:

  • Make Good Decisions
  • Solve Problems
  • Be Respectful

Is it a good decision to violate the law?  While it may solve problems for some, does it cause problems for others?  Is it being “respectful” to help your boss break the law?

What if it is your job on the line?  What will you be willing to do, and how will you respond?

Remarks On Gun Rights At Sunnyside Council

Monday night, I made the following remarks about gun rights during the meeting of the Sunnyside City Council.  My thanks to the City Clerk for researching the text of Ordinance No. 15 (passed in 1902).  In the future, I would like to make a visit to the city archives to see some of the other treasures our city’s founders bestowed to us.  It is my great pleasure to serve the people, and promote freedom everywhere I can.

STATEMENT ON GUN RIGHTS, 1/28/13 SUNNYSIDE CITY COUNCIL MEETING

Recent discussion of gun rights has prompted a public response from some officials in our state. These responses include remarks from the governor, the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, our legislators, and also our county sheriff.

Some are begging for more government control over citizens, and think they should be in charge of allowing them to possess firearms, and where (if ever), they should be allowed to carry them. Others advocate for greater freedom, pushing for increased rights of individuals.

Yakima County Sheriff Ken Irwin issued a statement last week in which he cited the U.S. and State of Washington Constitutions. He later clarified that he is opposed to the proposed ban on certain types of firearms that is being put forward by the President and his allies in Congress.

Elected officials take an oath to uphold the federal and state constitutions mentioned by our sheriff. Unfortunately, some municipal government officials in Washington do not always respect that.

For example, on January 15, 2013, at a meeting of the City Council in Oak Harbor, a failed attempt to trample on the 2nd amendment rights of citizens occured. Video of the incident is making the rounds on the Internet.

During that meeting, a Councilman asked a gun rights supporter if he was carrying a firearm in council chambers. He demanded an answer even after the city attorney said the citizen was not obligated to give one. The citizen did choose to answer, and confirmed he has a Concealed Pistol License, and was carrying a firearm.

In response, the councilman made an unconstitutional motion to strip the citizen of his firearm on the spot. The motion failed, causing the Mayor of Oak Harbor to apologize to the citizen for the behavior of some of his colleagues, and spoke to the oath of office that all electeds take. The councilman who made the motion left the meeting rather than stay in a room where citizens exercise their right to bear arms.

I would like to take just a moment to remind my colleagues, and members of the public, just what our oath of office supports, as it relates to gun rights.

The 2nd amendment of the US Constitution states:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

For those that question whether that applies to individual citizens; can you imagine George Washington leading an army if citizens did not possess firearms?

The other constitution that warrants our attention, is our own Washington State Constitution. Article I, Section 24 has the relevant language on the right to bear arms:

The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.

If one is still in doubt, our state constitution is much more explicit in its language that the right to bear arms is an individual right.

This is not a new debate among the people, nor is it the first time restrictions have been proposed by politicians.

Our city founders first regulated the rights of citizens to carry weapons within three months of the city’s founding. Ordinance No. 15 Prohibiting Carrying Concealed Weapons and Fixing Punishment Therefor was passed in 1902. This handwritten ordinance was signed by our first Mayor, James Henderson. One should take note that at the time, the city also did not allow gambling, alcohol, or dancing.

Times have changed since then, and I am not about to suggest we take away our citizen’s guns, anymore than I want to take away their dance halls or their beer! In over 110 years as a city, our citzens have repeatedly demonstrated at the ballot box that they prefer more freedom over less freedom.

In the present day, citizens of Sunnyside may obtain a Concealed Pistol License by submitting an application through our local police department. I encourage everyone to do this, even if they do not own a firearm.

By exercising their rights, citizens can send a message to politicians that they do not want more government restrictions on personal freedoms. When more citizens apply for a Concealed Pistol License, it demonstrates that the people are serious about maintaining their rights and personal safety, as outlined by both our federal and state constitutions.

 

On Abe Lincoln; Also, A Defense of Winners And Losers

Last weekend, I went to see “Lincoln” at the movie theater.  I was entertained, historically informed, and also left wondering how much of the movie was an actual portrayal of history versus Hollywood conjecture and “artistic license.”

In order to get some historical balance, I watched another recent release featuring Abraham Lincoln entitled, “Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter,” and found it to be as historical as the Steven Spielberg production already mentioned.

Living in a culture that is increasingly not reading newspapers, and showing increasing apathy towards politics, I can boldly make my claim with impunity.  When the oddball informed reader protests that one Lincoln movie was actually trying to portray real events while the other is a product of pure fiction, I can give any number of sound arguments to support my position.

“First of all,” I might say in response, “who are you to judge?

“How can anyone say that the movie directed by Timur Bakmambetov is any better or worse than the one directed by Steven Spielberg?”

This may lead some to cry out, “Steven Spielberg has a long, distinguished, movie-making career, and has made films far exceeding the box office sales of Timur Bakmambetov’s!”

To this, my retort is: “It’s not about winners and losers at the box office, it’s the fact that they both TRIED, and therefore the award for “Best Picture” goes to all new releases in 2012 (not just those about Lincoln).”  In this imaginary scenario, I can make such edicts, just stay with me on this thought experiment.

By now, the informed reader, who is still trying to make a logical and reasoned argument, will be feeling a little frustrated, and may be tempted to give up.  While understanding that they might do this, they must not ever quit.  The future of our nation depends on it. (This is not hyperbole, it is fact.)

Recent news stories have highlighted such things as a wheel-chair bound boy winning a spot on the  Homecoming Court, and a track champion stopping in the middle of a race because she wanted to help carry a fallen competitor across the finish line.  Both stories portrayed these things as positive events.

The prevailing wisdom among many in the mainstream education reform movement is that everyone is a winner, always.  There are no losers.

With this “knowledge” being taught in our schools, (perhaps by teachers who cheated on their state certification tests), I can soundly tell off the informed reader.

“Have you ever made a movie?”

“Then shut up dude!”

***SPOILER ALERT***

To conclude, having winners and losers is important, despite what is being taught in many classrooms these days.

“If it wasn’t for Abraham Lincoln, the vampires might have won the Civil War!  He is a national hero, man.”

Reflections On 2012 Election

GOP flag at half-mast (photo via msnNow.com)

When asked about the election, my response typically has been that it is encouraging that Washington voters once again re-instituted a 2/3 requirement for the state legislature to raise taxes.

As for everything else, I can find some bright spots here and there, but they are few and far between.

The big enchilada, the contest for President, is a particular disappointment.  11 days before the election, I made a prediction that Romney would get a majority of electoral votes.  This was based on his increasing momentum coming off the debates, which stalled out when Hurricane Sandy hit the east coast.  Key states that were close went to the incumbent.

States I was wrong about were Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Ohio, Virginia, and Wisconsin (which is Paul Ryan’s home state).

One famous libertarian leaning Congressman from Texas said that the Midwestern states that received benefit from auto manufacturing bailouts were to blame.  A conservative radio talk show host said essentially that “You can’t beat Santa Claus.” A blogger I follow lamented what he calls the “infantile” mindset of the majority of American voters, that want to be “taken care of” rather than show the “can-do” spirit this country is traditionally known for.

Media stories are warning of a “fiscal cliff,” and the American voters just put the hammer down.  Make no mistake about it, the politicians will discern from the election results that Americans want more government programs, and the increasing taxes that are required to fund them.

Conservatives of the future will likely resemble those of the more socialist European nations.  When running against the “liberals,” they will say they can run the government’s bureaucratic machine more efficiently.  The debate over whether the government should even be involved in these undertakings (i.e. auto manufacturing, providing healthcare, etc.) will not even be brought up for consideration. That debate was settled in the election of 2012.

Electoral College Prediction: Romney 291 – Obama 247

With 11 days to go, I am going to make a prediction on how the Electoral College votes will be distributed.

My prediction: Romney 291, Obama 247

This is just an exercise in fun, and if you wish to offer your own predictions, please respond and let me know.  The only caveat is that you are not allowed to leave any states in “toss up” status.  You must make a prediction as to which way it will go.

Nebraska and Maine potentially split electoral votes between candidates, and if you think that will happen, please let me know.  I don’t think this will happen in 2012, and my prediction shows all votes going to one candidate or the other from each state.

Bulldozers for McKenna Lots of Fun at Sunshine Days Parade

It was fun joining other supporters of Rob McKenna for Governor in the Sunshine Days Parade today.  Thanks also to State Representative David Taylor for having his own entry in the parade.  It is great to see the high school bands, beauty queens, cheerleaders, and businesses supporting a local event.

“Bulldozers for McKenna” happily rolled through Sunnyside during the Sunshine Days Parade today.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,976 other followers